AI Awareness as a Workplace Stressor: Examining Emotional Exhaustion Through Job Insecurity and Work–Family Interference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70301/JOUR/SBS-JABR/2026/14/3/2Keywords:
AI awareness; emotional exhaustion; job insecurity; work interference with familyAbstract
As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) gradually becomes an integral part of contemporary work settings, the awareness of AI, which can be defined as the extent to which employees feel that their jobs can be replaced by the automated systems, has proven to be a potentially influential factor of affective and psychosocial consequences, such as affective states, work-family balance, and emotional well-being on the whole. The present investigation aims to clarify the mediating variables that relate AI awareness to emotional exhaustion, in particular, the mediating role of perceived job insecurity, work demands, and family obligations. The study used a convenience sample of 303 employees (49.8% men) and conducted hierarchical regression models with bootstrap resampling to investigate mediation. The analytic approach included direct effect, indirect paths of AI awareness to emotional exhaustion and their serial mediation, and then the indirect path of the same to work insecurity and through work-family interference. The results showed that there was a significant positive relationship between AI awareness and emotional exhaustion. Moreover, AI awareness was positively related to perceived job insecurity, which, in turn, was positively related to emotional exhaustion. Parallel analyses indicated that AI awareness was also associated with increased work-family interference, which in turn was associated with increased emotional exhaustion. More importantly, job insecurity and work-family interference sequentially mediated the relationship between AI awareness and emotional exhaustion, suggesting a compounded negative pathway. Such findings highlight the urgent need for organizational leaders to address the twin issues of maintaining job security and achieving a balanced work-life environment, given that AI is being introduced as a source of workplace stress. In practice, it will entail open discussion of AI implementation, the design of overall reskilling programs, and the introduction of flexible working models to help reduce AI-related stressors and protect employees' psychological well-being.
References
Alhammadi, H., Bani-Melhem, S., Mohd-Shamsudin, F., Karrani, M., & Hamouche, S. (2024). Technological work burnout: Conceptualization, measure development and validation. Kybernetes, ahead-of-print.
Anthony, C. (2021). When knowledge work and analytical technologies collide: The practices and consequences of black boxing algorithmic technologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(4), 1173–1212.
Basu, S., Majumdar, B., Mukherjee, K., Munjal, S., & Palaksha, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence–HRM interactions and outcomes: A systematic review and causal configurational explanation. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100893.
Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023). Digitalization of cross-border R&D alliances: Configurational insights and cognitive digitalization biases. Global Strategy Journal, 13(2), 281–314.
Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2018). Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2), 239–257.
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 169–198.
Chen, N., Zhao, X., & Wang, L. (2024). The effect of job skill demands under artificial intelligence embeddedness on employees’ job performance: A moderated double-edged sword model. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 974.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Bulters, A. J. (2004). The loss spiral of work pressure, work–home interference and exhaustion: Reciprocal relations in a three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 131–149.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 86(3), 499–512.
Ding, L. (2021). Employees’ challenge-hindrance appraisals toward STARA awareness and competitive productivity: A micro-level case. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(9), 2950–2969.
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of ManagementAnnals, 14(2), 627–660.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
He, C., Teng, R., & Song, J. (2023). Linking employees’ challenge-hindrance appraisals toward AI to service performance: The influences of job crafting, job insecurity and AI knowledge. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(3), 975–994.
Hellgren, J., Sverke, M., & Isaksson, K. (1999). A two-dimensional approach to job insecurity: Consequences for employee attitudes and well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 179–195.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
Horowitz, M. C., Kahn, L., Macdonald, J., & Schneider, J. (2024). Adopting AI: How familiarity breeds both trust and contempt. AI & Society, 39(4), 1721–1735.
Hu, S., Jiang, L., Probst, T. M., & Liu, M. (2021). The relationship between qualitative job insecurity and subjective well-being in Chinese employees: The role of work–family conflict and work centrality. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 42(2), 203–225.
Jiang, L., & Lavaysse, L. M. (2018). Cognitive and affective job insecurity: A meta-analysis and a primary study. Journal of Management,44(6), 2307–2342.
Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555.
Kong, H., Yuan, Y., Baruch, Y., Bu, N., Jiang, X., & Wang, K. (2021). Influences of artificial intelligence (AI) awareness on career competency and job burnout. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(2), 717–734.
Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping (Vol. 464). Springer.
Lee, C., Huang, G.-H., & Ashford, S. J. (2018). Job insecurity and the changing workplace: Recent developments and the future trends in job insecurity research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 335–359.
Liang, X., Guo, G., Shu, L., Gong, Q., & Luo, P. (2022). Investigating the double-edged sword effect of AI awareness on employee’s service innovative behavior. Tourism Management, 92, 104564.
Lingmont, D. N., & Alexiou, A. (2020). The contingent effect of job automating technology awareness on perceived job insecurity: Exploring the moderating role of organizational culture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120302. MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies.
Maier, C., Laumer, S., Thatcher, J. B., Wirth, J., & Weitzel, T. (2022). Trial-period technostress: A conceptual definition and mixed- methods investigation. Information Systems Research, 33(2), 489–514.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.
Nauman, S., Zheng, C., & Naseer, S. (2020). Job insecurity and work–family conflict: A moderated mediation model of perceived organizational justice, emotional exhaustion and work withdrawal. International Journal of Conflict Management, 31(5), 729–751.
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400–410.
Petitta, L., Probst, T. M., Ghezzi, V., Bettac, E. L., Lavaysse, L. M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2024). Job insecurity and work–family interface as predictors of mental and physical health: The moderating role of family–work stereotype threat. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 97(2), 452–478.
Richter, A., Näswall, K., & Sverke, M. (2010). Job insecurity and its relation to work—Family conflict: Mediation with a longitudinal data set. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(2), 265–280.
Shen, J., Zheng, J., & Zhang, T. (2023). The association between future self-continuity and problematic mobile video gaming among Chinese college students: The serial mediation of consideration of future consequences and state self-control capacity. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 227.
Shneiderman, B. (1984). Response time and display rate in human performance with computers. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR),16(3), 265–285.
Shoss, M. K. (2017). Job insecurity: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1911–1939.
Tang, P. M., Koopman, J., Yam, K. C., De Cremer, D., Zhang, J. H., & Reynders, P. (2023). The self-regulatory consequences of dependence on intelligent machines at work: Evidence from field and experimental studies. Human Resource Management, 62(5), 721–744.
Teng, R., Zhou, S., Zheng, W., & Ma, C. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) awareness and work withdrawal: Evaluating chained mediation through negative work-related rumination and emotional exhaustion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(7), 2311–2326.
Van Griethuijsen, R. A., van Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., Den Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., Savran Gencer, A., & BouJaoude, S. (2015). Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 45, 581–603. Voydanoff, P. (2004). The effects of work demands and resources on work-to-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 398–412.
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 486–493.
Yam, K. C., Tang, P. M., Jackson, J. C., Su, R., & Gray, K. (2023). The rise of robots increases job insecurity and maladaptive workplace behaviors: Multimethod evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(5), 850–870.
Yu, K. (2017). Schedule control, work interference with family, and emotional exhaustion: A reciprocal moderated mediation model. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 11, e3.
Zhang, X., & Jin, H. (2023). How does smart technology, artificial intelligence, automation, robotics, and algorithms (STAARA) awareness affect hotel employees’ career perceptions? A disruptive innovation theory perspective. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 32(2), 264–283.
Zhao, J., Hu, E., Han, M., Jiang, K., & Shan, H. (2023). That honey, my arsenic: The influence of advanced technologies on service employees’ organizational deviance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103490.
Zheng, J., & Shen, J. (2025). Social comparisons for well-being: The role of power distance. Social Indicators Research.
Zheng, J., & Zhang, T. (2023). The effects of the internet on well-being among older adults ageing in place: The roles of subjective income and social trust. China Perspectives, (134), 43–55.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Diyani Balthazaar, Radna Andi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publication Agreement
This Publication Agreement ("Agreement") is made between the author(s) ("Author") and the SBS Journal of Applied Business Research ("Journal"). By submitting a manuscript for publication, the Author agrees to the following terms:
1. Grant of License
The Author retains full copyright ownership of the submitted and published work. The Author grants the Journal a non-exclusive license to publish, distribute, and archive the article in any format or medium, including but not limited to online and print versions.
2. Open Access and Licensing
All articles published in the Journal are fully open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means that:
• The work can be freely used, shared, and adapted by anyone, provided that proper attribution is given to the original Author.
• The full license terms can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
• No additional restrictions are placed on the use of published articles.
3. Author Responsibilities and Warranties
The Author guarantees that:
• The submitted work is original and has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.
• The work does not infringe on any third-party rights, including copyright, trademark, or proprietary rights.
• All necessary permissions for copyrighted materials used in the manuscript (e.g., figures, tables) have been obtained.
• The manuscript complies with ethical research standards and does not contain any form of plagiarism or falsified data.
4. Editorial and Publication Process
• The Journal reserves the right to perform editorial revisions for clarity, formatting, and consistency while maintaining the integrity of the Author’s work.
• The publication of an article is subject to peer review, and acceptance is not guaranteed upon submission.
5. Retraction and Corrections
• The Journal follows COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines and reserves the right to retract, correct, or withdraw an article in cases of misconduct, errors, or ethical concerns.
6. Governing Law
This Agreement is governed by the laws of Switzerland. Any disputes arising under this Agreement shall be resolved in the courts of Zurich, Switzerland.
7. Agreement Acceptance
By submitting a manuscript, the Author acknowledges and agrees to the terms outlined in this Agreement.
Editor-In-Chief
Prof. Dr. Milos Petkovic






